I don't know if I'm an Ian McEwan fan or not. I saw Atonement, after everyone had been raving about how good it was, and quite frankly I thought it sucked. Then I saw a preview for this movie called "Enduring Love" starring Samantha Morton, Daniel Craig and Rhys Ifans, all of whom I adore. So I watched it, really liked it, and realized it was based on an Ian McEwan novel. Now I know that movies can very often ruin books (The Fountainhead anyone?), so I wanted to do a bit of a comparison.
I recently was in Korea and while there realized that my friend had a couple of McEwan books sitting around.
First I read this one, On Chesil Beach.

It's terrible. It has a few good lines but really is just a boring story of two people who never communicate with one another (presumably due to social mores of the day, but I don't buy it) and that's it. That's the entire story. Don't read it.
She also had Enduring Love, which was really exciting to me as I wanted to do a comparison between the book and the movie.

The movie was really good. The book was only slightly better. It had a bit more exposition, as books are able to do. Worth watching and reading though. It's a story about people who witness a terrible accident and how that affects their relationships with one another.
So based on that, I thought I would give Atonement a shot.

I'm about 3/4 of the way through it. This says something to me. If I really liked it, I'd be finished with it already. Somehow, riding my bike always wins in what I want to do with my time though. It's ok. I'll reserve judgment until I'm finished, but so far, meh.
I still don't know if I'm a McEwan fan or not.